<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Respect and honour towards women in New England</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/</link>
	<description>Daily quote from the puritans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>David, thank you.

Of course, to use &quot;they&quot; as a singular pronoun (as is often done) is silly. It&#039;s interesting that &quot;they&quot; is feminine; I didn&#039;t know that. But it raises a question:  What should we use for a mixed group (3rd person)?

Also, with respect to the singular, are you saying we should always use &quot;he&quot; as the default?

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, thank you.</p>
<p>Of course, to use &#8220;they&#8221; as a singular pronoun (as is often done) is silly. It&#8217;s interesting that &#8220;they&#8221; is feminine; I didn&#8217;t know that. But it raises a question:  What should we use for a mixed group (3rd person)?</p>
<p>Also, with respect to the singular, are you saying we should always use &#8220;he&#8221; as the default?</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R. McCrory</title>
		<link>http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>David R. McCrory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Chuck, that&#039;s right. We have capitulated to feminism through the defaulted use of feminine gender pronoun usage. Situations in which gender is unknown or netural used to always default back to the masculine form of the noun. 

This is particularly true in the usage of &quot;they&quot; (f) in mixed company. &quot;They&quot; is a feminine noun. It is a subtle yet important distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck, that&#8217;s right. We have capitulated to feminism through the defaulted use of feminine gender pronoun usage. Situations in which gender is unknown or netural used to always default back to the masculine form of the noun. </p>
<p>This is particularly true in the usage of &#8220;they&#8221; (f) in mixed company. &#8220;They&#8221; is a feminine noun. It is a subtle yet important distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deejay</title>
		<link>http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Deejay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>You may well be correct that it has its roots in feminism, as its quite common today too, to hear of God referred to as a &quot;she&quot;  or such as some new &quot;bible&quot; translations,  go on to make a genderless God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may well be correct that it has its roots in feminism, as its quite common today too, to hear of God referred to as a &#8220;she&#8221;  or such as some new &#8220;bible&#8221; translations,  go on to make a genderless God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>In the last few decades, the default singular personal pronoun has become feminine:  &quot;When a philosopher undertakes to investigate the nature of naturalism, SHE must deal with W.V.O. Quine.&quot; I have been unable to get on board with this move from the male (or both--&quot;he or she&quot;) to the female pronoun in my academic writing, because I have sensed a feminist agenda in it.

Today&#039;s quote represents the only way I can imagine this practice&#039;s possibly being justified.

Does anyone have an opinion on the matter?

Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last few decades, the default singular personal pronoun has become feminine:  &#8220;When a philosopher undertakes to investigate the nature of naturalism, SHE must deal with W.V.O. Quine.&#8221; I have been unable to get on board with this move from the male (or both&#8211;&#8221;he or she&#8221;) to the female pronoun in my academic writing, because I have sensed a feminist agenda in it.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s quote represents the only way I can imagine this practice&#8217;s possibly being justified.</p>
<p>Does anyone have an opinion on the matter?</p>
<p>Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apuritanatheart.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/respect-and-honour-towards-women-in-new-england/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Wow. I wish it was still that way. We&#039;ve devolved quite a long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I wish it was still that way. We&#8217;ve devolved quite a long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
